Searching the Composite Database


  • Keyword searching

    OWL may be searched in a variety of ways: e.g., via keyword searching of text, author, database code, sequence fragment, etc. - the information returned in the output from such queries may be modified by changing the Qualifier switch provided. To build more complex, and perhaps more useful, queries, simple keyword searches can be combined using the logical operator functions provided by OWL's query language, DELPHOS - the type of queries to be combined may be specified using the Function switch provided.

  • Similarity searching

    By contrast with keyword searching, which is identity matching, it is also possible to search OWL for sequence similarities. Similarity measures are usually classified as global or local. Global algorithms optimise the full alignment of 2 sequences, which may include large dissimilar regions. Local similarity algorithms focus on conserved subsequences, a single comparison often yielding several alignments (dissimilar regions do not contribute to the similarity measure). Local similarity tools, such as BLAST, are usually preferred for database searches, where cDNA's may be compared with partially sequenced genes, or where distantly-related proteins may share only isolated regions of similarity (e.g., in the vicinity of an active site). Interpretation of results is relatively straightforward, requiring one to identify high-scoring sequences, or groups of sequences, with low probabilities that such matches may have arisen by chance. Low scores with probabilities tending to 1.0 indicate chance matches, as shown in the following diagram .


    <